Benchmark
The Polish construction industry - 2024 analysis
Market size, leading contractors, profitability spread, and sector cycle in one place. PKD section F (41 - building construction, 42 - civil engineering, 43 - specialised works) seen through KRS data.
Published: April 30, 2026

Section F at a glance
Construction (PKD section F) covers three large divisions:
- 41 - construction of buildings (residential and non-residential),
- 42 - civil engineering (roads, bridges, utility networks),
- 43 - specialised construction activities (installations, finishing, site preparation).
By number of registered entities, section F is consistently one of the largest in the Polish economy; by concentration - one of the most fragmented.
Industry cycle: scale year over year
Construction is strongly cyclical - growth correlates with public investment, mortgage availability, and EU programmes. Sector activity has grown over recent years, but unevenly.
Aggregate net revenue of the Polish construction industry (indicative, PLN bn)
Data: Aggregate of KRS filings and GUS data for section F, as of 2026-05-01.
Largest contractors
The revenue leaders are nationwide general contractors - infrastructure, energy, and rail. In the Mazowieckie voivodeship, where most large operators are registered:
Top 10 companies in mazowieckie (PKD 41)
| # | Company | City | Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DOM CONSTRUCTION | WARSZAWA | 1.4 B PLN |
| 2 | GALLEON | WARSZAWA | 1.2 B PLN |
| 3 | ALDESA CONSTRUCCIONES POLSKA | WARSZAWA | 933.3 M PLN |
| 4 | GENCO INVEST | WARSZAWA | 910.6 M PLN |
| 5 | ARCHE | KONSTANCIN-JEZIORNA | 721.1 M PLN |
| 6 | HOCHTIEF POLSKA | WARSZAWA | 670.9 M PLN |
| 7 | VINCI ENVIRONNEMENT POLSKA | WARSZAWA | 644.5 M PLN |
| 8 | LEROY-MERLIN INWESTYCJE | WARSZAWA | 478.9 M PLN |
| 9 | MKL BAU | SIEDLCE | 457.6 M PLN |
| 10 | TECHBAU BUDOWNICTWO | NOWE GROCHOLICE | 449.8 M PLN |
Civil engineering (PKD 42)
Division 42 is dominated by companies working on roads, bridges, networks, and engineering structures. The segment is highly dependent on the CPK, KPO, and municipal investment pipelines:
Top 10 companies in mazowieckie (PKD 42)
| # | Company | City | Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | STRABAG | PRUSZKÓW | 5.9 B PLN |
| 2 | ZAKŁADY AUTOMATYKI KOMBUD | RADOM | 514.7 M PLN |
| 3 | ENPROM | WARSZAWA | 468.5 M PLN |
| 4 | SPECTRIS ENERGY | WARSZAWA | 458.6 M PLN |
| 5 | PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWO BUDOWY DRÓG I MOSTÓW | MIŃSK MAZOWIECKI | 440.0 M PLN |
| 6 | PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWO BUDOWNICTWA ELEKTROENERGETYCZNEGO ELBUD WARSZAWA | WARSZAWA | 293.7 M PLN |
| 7 | SOLUTIONS 30 TELECOM | SIEDLCE | 232.7 M PLN |
| 8 | VAN OORD OFFSHORE WIND POLAND | WARSZAWA | 230.0 M PLN |
| 9 | DOMOST | MAŁKINIA GÓRNA | 223.9 M PLN |
| 10 | HITACHI RAIL GTS POLSKA | WARSZAWA | 221.6 M PLN |
Size distribution in the capital
To see where the "typical" contractor sits, look at the revenue distribution across all Warsaw-registered companies - the leaderboard above pulls firmly above the median:
Net revenue - distribution in WARSZAWA (2025)
n = 78,345 · coverage: 94%
Most profitable
Net margin in construction is traditionally lower than in IT or pharma, but varies sharply by sub-sector and customer type. Sorting by net profit highlights operators that managed to close the year well:
Top 10 companies in mazowieckie (PKD 41)
| # | Company | City | Net profit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DOM CONSTRUCTION | WARSZAWA | 28.4 K PLN |
| 2 | GALLEON | WARSZAWA | 50.9 M PLN |
| 3 | ALDESA CONSTRUCCIONES POLSKA | WARSZAWA | -40.3 M PLN |
| 4 | GENCO INVEST | WARSZAWA | 3.9 M PLN |
| 5 | ARCHE | KONSTANCIN-JEZIORNA | 95.8 M PLN |
| 6 | HOCHTIEF POLSKA | WARSZAWA | -91.3 M PLN |
| 7 | VINCI ENVIRONNEMENT POLSKA | WARSZAWA | 6.2 M PLN |
| 8 | LEROY-MERLIN INWESTYCJE | WARSZAWA | 60.7 M PLN |
| 9 | MKL BAU | SIEDLCE | 18.2 M PLN |
| 10 | TECHBAU BUDOWNICTWO | NOWE GROCHOLICE | 10.9 M PLN |
What this means for the market
“Construction rankings in Poland shift faster than in most industries - one large contract can lift a company several positions, the absence of one can drop it the same. To gauge the sector, watch the median and lower quartiles, not just the visible leaders.”
- The sector is fragmented - the top 10 share of total section-F revenue is a minority.
- Cyclicality demands a 3-year window for any judgement. A single year can be exceptionally strong or weak depending on the public-investment phase.
- The median sits noticeably below the average because of the large micro-enterprise tail - that's normal for construction and shouldn't be read as weakness.
Related articles
Benchmark
Profitability of the Polish transport industry - 2024 analysis
What does profitability look like in PKD section H (transport and storage) in 2024? Industry median, percentiles, regional standouts, and a list of the largest operators benchmarked against the market median.
Ranking
The largest IT companies in Warsaw - 2026 ranking
Top 10 Warsaw-based IT companies (PKD 62.01 - software-related activities) ranked by net revenue. Size distribution, industry median, and benchmarks against the wider Warsaw market.