Benchmark

The Polish construction industry - 2024 analysis

Market size, leading contractors, profitability spread, and sector cycle in one place. PKD section F (41 - building construction, 42 - civil engineering, 43 - specialised works) seen through KRS data.

Published: May 1, 2026

The Polish construction industry - 2024 analysis

Section F at a glance

Construction (PKD section F) covers three large divisions:

  • 41 - construction of buildings (residential and non-residential),
  • 42 - civil engineering (roads, bridges, utility networks),
  • 43 - specialised construction activities (installations, finishing, site preparation).

By number of registered entities, section F is consistently one of the largest in the Polish economy; by concentration - one of the most fragmented.

Industry cycle: scale year over year

Construction is strongly cyclical - growth correlates with public investment, mortgage availability, and EU programmes. Sector activity has grown over recent years, but unevenly.

Aggregate net revenue of the Polish construction industry (indicative, PLN bn)

218bn
2019
+3.7%226bn
2020
+11.1%251bn
2021
+14.3%287bn
2022
+2.8%295bn
2023
+3.1%304bn
2024

Data: Aggregate of KRS filings and GUS data for section F, as of 2026-05-01.

Largest contractors

The revenue leaders are nationwide general contractors - infrastructure, energy, and rail. In the Mazowieckie voivodeship, where most large operators are registered:

Top 10 companies in mazowieckie (PKD 41)

#CompanyRevenue
1PORR4.0 B PLN
2ERBUD3.3 B PLN
3MOSTOSTAL WARSZAWA1.6 B PLN
4DOM CONSTRUCTION1.4 B PLN
5GALLEON1.2 B PLN
6ALDESA CONSTRUCCIONES POLSKA933.3 M PLN
7ARCHE721.1 M PLN
8HOCHTIEF POLSKA670.9 M PLN
9VINCI ENVIRONNEMENT POLSKA644.5 M PLN
10STRUS DEVELOPMENT487.3 M PLN

Civil engineering (PKD 42)

Division 42 is dominated by companies working on roads, bridges, networks, and engineering structures. The segment is highly dependent on the CPK, KPO, and municipal investment pipelines:

Top 10 companies in mazowieckie (PKD 42)

#CompanyRevenue
1BUDIMEX9.4 B PLN
2STRABAG5.9 B PLN
3TRAKCJA2.2 B PLN
4AMW SINEVIA2.0 B PLN
5ZAKŁADY AUTOMATYKI KOMBUD514.7 M PLN
6ENPROM468.5 M PLN
7SPECTRIS ENERGY458.6 M PLN
8PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWO BUDOWY DRÓG I MOSTÓW SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ W RESTRUKTURYZACJI440.0 M PLN
9PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWO BUDOWNICTWA ELEKTROENERGETYCZNEGO ELBUD WARSZAWA293.7 M PLN
10MDI ENERGIA252.9 M PLN

Size distribution in the capital

To see where the "typical" contractor sits, look at the revenue distribution across all Warsaw-registered companies - the leaderboard above pulls firmly above the median:

Net revenue - distribution in WARSZAWA (2025)

n = 78,345 · coverage: 94%

P10: 0P25: 0Median: 275.4 KP75: 2.3 MP90: 10.7 M

Most profitable

Net margin in construction is traditionally lower than in IT or pharma, but varies sharply by sub-sector and customer type. Sorting by net profit highlights operators that managed to close the year well:

Top 10 companies in mazowieckie (PKD 41)

#CompanyNet profit
1PORR77.3 M PLN
2ERBUD-35.8 M PLN
3MOSTOSTAL WARSZAWA-26.9 M PLN
4DOM CONSTRUCTION29.1 M PLN
5GALLEON50.9 M PLN
6ALDESA CONSTRUCCIONES POLSKA-40.3 M PLN
7ARCHE95.8 M PLN
8HOCHTIEF POLSKA-91.3 M PLN
9VINCI ENVIRONNEMENT POLSKA6.2 M PLN
10STRUS DEVELOPMENT125.2 M PLN

What this means for the market

Construction rankings in Poland shift faster than in most industries - one large contract can lift a company several positions, the absence of one can drop it the same. To gauge the sector, watch the median and lower quartiles, not just the visible leaders.

- KRS benchmark practice
  • The sector is fragmented - the top 10 share of total section-F revenue is a minority.
  • Cyclicality demands a 3-year window for any judgement. A single year can be exceptionally strong or weak depending on the public-investment phase.
  • The median sits noticeably below the average because of the large micro-enterprise tail - that's normal for construction and shouldn't be read as weakness.

All articles